I was amazed that Steven Haynes had no position on the anti-smoking issue in the Thursday debate. How can you not have a position on this issue by now? How long has he been on the city council? Why is he running again?
I thought the writeup in the SI was better then the DE this time. But the SI version is gone into the bit bucket, or at least I can't figure out how to find it.
Why would you vote for Steven Haynes for City Council? Hasn't he proven himself to be a no-op yet?
I wonder if Steven reads the documents the city manager prepares for him before the city council meetings? Maybe someone could ask him?
Your comments are welcome.