After almost 4 years in office, Lance Jack has proposed a rule, idea or law. We all know that if the anti-smoking gang had wanted a compromise deal, the law would have sailed through. But, they don't, they want a ban. It doesn't matter anyway, because soon or later there will be a state law and that will be that. Here is the SI article from today's paper.
I have been wondering if Lance reads the documents the city manager prepares before the city council meetings? Maybe someone might ask him?
I wrote a little thing about Lance and if he should be reelected, but there was no discussion. I can't figure out if this matters to me one way or the other in that regard.
Anyone want to laud Lance or throw him under the bus?
2 comments:
Mary Pohlman had this proposal tagged the second he did it -- which workers *shouldn't* be protected? If you're for the smoking ban, this makes no sense. If you're against it, the proposal still makes little sense. This is a desperate move by Jack to right the campaign ship with two weeks left until election day. Too little, too late -- there are better choices out there.
I'm wondering, who is better then Lance? Haynes? Liz Lewin?
I like Mary Pohlman, but beyond that this group isn't inspiring me much.
Post a Comment